Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:51:47 05/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2002 at 14:50:11, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 01, 2002 at 13:32:07, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On May 01, 2002 at 12:39:54, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2002 at 05:55:45, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>This time, comet left its terrible book wirh a minus of 2 pawns. >>>>Nevertheless it seems that Fritz1 can't win this. >>>>Note that Fritz was already very bad in time and its eval was approaching zero. >>>>Last not least, this game starts boaring me. >>>> >>>>I'm not sure if I'll continue this match. Amateurs like yace or pharaon are far >>>>more interesting opponents than this "movegen-and-search-only" opponent. >>>> >>>> >>>>Uli >>> >>>You should try Genius 3 it will definitively give you a surprise. >> >>No. I know Lang's programs very well. Comet has played them a lot, starting with >>Mephisto Dallas, Genius1, ... Genius6.5 . >>These are excellent engines; they have dominated computer chess for a long time. >>Even for todays standards, they are strong, though they are probably a bit >>behind the very top like Fritz7, Tiger & Shredder6. >> >>Uli > > >This is a 1997 old program top winboard program like your should be able to beat >this 5 years old program by Lang. Are you admiting that a 5 years old commercial >program like Genius 3 is still stronger than a top winboard program like your >using similar hardware. > > >Pichard. Genius3 is from 1994. I guess that it can score 40-50% against programs like Comet. It is for tournament time control and I guess that in blitz it has chances to score even better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.