Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:54:41 05/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 01, 2002 at 14:50:11, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On May 01, 2002 at 13:32:07, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>
>>On May 01, 2002 at 12:39:54, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>On May 01, 2002 at 05:55:45, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>>
>>>>This time, comet left its terrible book wirh a minus of 2 pawns.
>>>>Nevertheless it seems that Fritz1 can't win this.
>>>>Note that Fritz was already very bad in time and its eval was approaching zero.
>>>>Last not least, this game starts boaring me.
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure if I'll continue this match. Amateurs like yace or pharaon are far
>>>>more interesting opponents than this "movegen-and-search-only" opponent.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Uli
>>>
>>>You should try Genius 3 it will definitively give you a surprise.
>>
>>No. I know Lang's programs very well. Comet has played them a lot, starting with
>>Mephisto Dallas, Genius1, ... Genius6.5 .
>>These are excellent engines; they have dominated computer chess for a long time.
>>Even for todays standards, they are strong, though they are probably a bit
>>behind the very top like Fritz7, Tiger & Shredder6.
>>
>>Uli
>
>
>This is a 1997 old program top winboard program like your should be able to beat
>this 5 years old program by Lang. Are you admiting that a 5 years old commercial
>program like Genius 3 is still stronger than a top winboard program like your
>using similar hardware.
Behind the Genius engines there are 10-15 years of full time hard work.
It does not matter if it is old or not, coming after him does not mean you can
beat it.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.