Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:55:24 05/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2002 at 06:27:12, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 02, 2002 at 05:55:05, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >>>Sorry... I don“t understand German Eduard! :-( >>> >>>Could you please tell me why you are using Genius 3 in your analisys??? I know >>>that Genius was a great program, but do you think that Genius3 has something >>>special that other programs does not have???? >>> >> >> >>Eudard states that speed (high node speed) is not all there is to strong >>computer chess play. High search depths in situations without tactical >>opportunities often makes the chess engine lose track of the whole picture. > >I disagree. > >A lot of weak programs have not high search depth and it does not help them. > >Genius may be better in the specific positions(I did not check it) but I do not >believe that it has better positional understanding relative to other top >programs. > >Uri I agree that Chess Genius 3 has no better positional understanding than the top commecial programs, but I have seen in several occasions where people have used some of the top winboard programs like YACE, Crafty, SOS, SJeng etc..., and nobody here complaint one bit about it. I personally think that none of these winboard programs are much better than Genius 3. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.