Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 08:40:33 05/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2002 at 11:10:20, Peter Berger wrote: >On May 02, 2002 at 05:22:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On May 02, 2002 at 00:57:02, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On May 01, 2002 at 19:01:07, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>The games were played with 30 minutes sudden death (blitz) time control; match >>>>was scheduled for 12 games. >>>> >>>>Yace used 2.5 MB for hashtables, no tablebases and a little opening book. The >>>>Palm Vx has been overclocked with AfterBurner - Tiger's displays Speed index of >>>>1.10 for this device. >>>> >>>>The hardware advantage for Yace in this match should have been somewhere around >>>>factor 4-6. >>> >>> >>> >>>Thanks for playing the games! >>> >>>Any idea of the rating of Yace on this computer? >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >> >>It would be better to test CT 14.9 vs Chessmaster 4000 or Genius 1 which have >>ratings of 2192 and 2184 after you drop 100 points from the SSDF rating List of >>1997. >> >Why is that?? Hi Peter, that's because at some point in the last years, SSDF had decided to re-gauge their list. They had the feelings that their ELO overestimated the programs. So, they - more or less arbitrarily - decided to subtract 100 from all their ratings. This means for older SSDF lists, you have to subtract 100 in order to compare to the newer values. Uli > >Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.