Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer chess vs. computer checkers and other games

Author: Vine Smith

Date: 04:19:48 05/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 04, 2002 at 06:34:55, Pekka Karjalainen wrote:

>
>... about checkers, you should know that there are a ton of variants.  But the
>two most popular, in a way, are the British/American 8x8 checkers, which Chinook
>pretty much rules, and so-called International checkers, which is played on a
>10x10 board.
>
>In the latter I think the human GM's are still superior.  A while ago there was
>a match between an African GM Samb and a top program called Buggy.
>
>http://www.buggy-online.com/english/match_samb_buggy/match_samb_buggy_e.htm
>
>  If you check the results you can see that Samb won.  Of course, there are not
>enough results to say anything for sure, but at least there are no results where
>the programs have won against the very best palyers.
>
>  These games differ not only in board size but in other rules having to do with
>captures and promotion to kings.

If you look at the analyzed games on the site, you'll notice a striking
similarity to the situation in computer chess -- the program was a dangerous
tactician, but had no "feel" for the position. Samb won the tiebreak by
exploiting a positional weakness he had noticed in an earlier game. Since
draughts is a more tactical game than chess, this would seem to indicate that
positional problems will continue to plague chess programs far into the future.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.