Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer chess vs. computer checkers and other games

Author: Vine Smith

Date: 04:19:48 05/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 04, 2002 at 06:34:55, Pekka Karjalainen wrote:

>
>... about checkers, you should know that there are a ton of variants.  But the
>two most popular, in a way, are the British/American 8x8 checkers, which Chinook
>pretty much rules, and so-called International checkers, which is played on a
>10x10 board.
>
>In the latter I think the human GM's are still superior.  A while ago there was
>a match between an African GM Samb and a top program called Buggy.
>
>http://www.buggy-online.com/english/match_samb_buggy/match_samb_buggy_e.htm
>
>  If you check the results you can see that Samb won.  Of course, there are not
>enough results to say anything for sure, but at least there are no results where
>the programs have won against the very best palyers.
>
>  These games differ not only in board size but in other rules having to do with
>captures and promotion to kings.

If you look at the analyzed games on the site, you'll notice a striking
similarity to the situation in computer chess -- the program was a dangerous
tactician, but had no "feel" for the position. Samb won the tiebreak by
exploiting a positional weakness he had noticed in an earlier game. Since
draughts is a more tactical game than chess, this would seem to indicate that
positional problems will continue to plague chess programs far into the future.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.