Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 14:14:24 05/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2002 at 16:35:58, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:
>.....ooops, hit that button too fast....
>
>
>after </quote>:
>
>...so you can make up your own crap after $130 at your convenience, sir :)))
>
>All the best...
>
>J.
>
>ps. of course it was all the $xx garbage I was referring at. It certainly isn't
>"worth the $$$" :)
Hmm...
Future definition, is it the same as make your own definition? I thought it was
for extending the standard.
But this is discussed before, therby I added a :) to my line.
Here is the values used by Chessbase (Clip from NagValues.h in PolarEngine
source).
// The NAG value below 139 is comming from Andrew Templeton on rgcc
"with the idea",
"aimed against",
"better is",
"worse is",
"equal is",
"RR",
"N",
"weak point",
"endgame",
"line",
"diagonal",
"White has pair of bishops",
"Black has pair of bishops",
"Bishops of opposite color",
"Bishops of same color",
"White has united pawns",
"Black has united pawns",
"White has separated pawns",
"Black has separated pawns",
"White has doubled pawns",
"Black has doubled pawns",
"White has passed pawn",
"Black has passed pawn",
"White has adv. in no. pawns",
"Black has adv. in no. pawns"
Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.