Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 07:27:36 05/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2002 at 10:23:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 05, 2002 at 09:58:39, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On May 05, 2002 at 09:48:15, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 05, 2002 at 09:46:22, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>This time, I got the auto232 working. >>>>With, Comet using the faster hardware, things seem to become hopeless for the >>>>old Genius. >>>>IMHO, the old Lang engines have serious problems playing strong amateurs on >>>>modern processors (despite of the games posted by Jorge Pichard). >>>> >>>>Uli >>> >>>The games that were posted by Jorge pichard are of Genius3 and not of Genius2. >>> >>>Uri >> >>IIRC the SSDF list correctly, there was hardly any difference in rating between >>those 2. >> >>Uli > >The ssdf did not test Genius2 and Genius3 on the new hardware and the only >common hardware that was used was 486 50-66 mhz. > >It is possible that the difference between genius3 and genius2 was bigger with >the new hardware(one possible reason is the fact that genius3 could use more >hash tables). Okay, that's an argument. Better use of memory could have some influence. Uli > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.