Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:59:24 05/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2002 at 15:23:49, Terry Ripple wrote: >The games are interesting in the fact which shows Tiger looking deeper plys than >Hiarcs but has an even score. It goes to show with these games that looking >deeper don't mean better results! I do realize that you need many more games to >come to any type of accurate conclusions. > >Regards, > Terry bigger nominal depth does not mean looking deeper becasuse the sides do not use the same extensions. for example in game 9 it seems that hiarcs saw deeper. [D]r1bqrk2/1p6/p1pb1pQ1/3p4/3PPP2/2N5/PP4PP/4RRK1 b - - 0 20 Tiger14 blundered by 20...dxe4 inspite of getting nominal depth of 13 when hiarcs replied by 21.Nxe4 with a winning score in spite of getting nominal depth of only 11. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.