Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer chess vs. computer checkers and other games

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 06:56:26 05/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 06, 2002 at 01:16:41, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 06, 2002 at 00:41:48, Russell Reagan wrote:
>
>>On May 05, 2002 at 06:54:48, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I think that there are only 32 squares and 4 kind of pieces and it means that
>>>5^32 is an upper bound for the number of position(a square may be empty)
>>>
>>>5^32 is only an upper bound and the number of practical positions to analyze may
>>>be clearly smaller.
>>
>>
>>443,748,401,247 is the number of positions in the 8-piece (or fewer) endgame
>>tablebases for draughts.
>>
>>That number is extremely close to 441,739,287,424, which is the number of
>>possible positions with 8 pieces on the board (32*31*30*29*28*27*26*25)
>
>
>It is not the number of possible positions with 8 pieces on the board.
>
>choosing 8 different squares in the board can be done in
>
>32*31*30*29*28*27*25*25/(8*7*6*5*4*3*2)
>
>After that you need to put in every square a number (1-4) to tell the computer
>the kind of piece that is there so you need to multiply that number by 4^8.
>
>4^8=65536>8*7*6*5*4*3*2=40320 so the number is slightly bigger but your formula
>gives bigger numbers for tablebases of more than 8 pieces.
>
>
>Uri

I took that original number straight off the Chinook website, so it is an exact
value of the number of positions with 8 or fewer pieces.

Russell



This page took 0.85 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.