Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 22:40:51 07/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 1998 at 23:18:33, blass uri wrote: >I think Rebel10 did a draw in the 7th game because anand played too fast. >If anand thought more about the move 33.d6 then he would win >becuse in this case Rebel10 was playing Qe6(because in this case it had more >time to think on anand's time) >and after 34.Bc6 Rc3 35.bxc3 Qc4 36.Bb2 Qxf1+ 37.Qc1 Qxc1+? 38.Bxc1 Rb1+? >39.Kxa2 Rxc1 >40.cxd4 Rxc6 41.d7 Ra6+ 42.Kb3 Rb6+ 43.Kc4 Rb8 44.Kc5 >white is winning > >am I right? >does Rebel10 do the moves I gave for black from 34 to 43 > >I checked the position after Qe6 34.Bc6 with the version of Junior amir ban sent >me and ir needed hours to find 34...Rc3 before that it prefered R3b4 >how did Amir Ban found the line begin with 34...Rc3 >did he give Junior a long time to evaluate the position or maybe he looked >on Rebel's homepage or maybe he has another version of Junior > >Uri If if if if if if ?!? What do you try to do ? astrology ?? You really consider that increasing rebels permanent brain time would have changed rebels play into a loss ?! You are maybe right, but when I use this point of view, i am sure I find 10 different moves in REBELS play where it would have played better if anand has considered longer. I don't think it does not make much sense to discuss this. You think ONE recoursion to deep. Analysis based on: if rebel would have played Qe6 is ok , but the rekursion level you try is far to deep... IMO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.