Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:14:11 05/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2002 at 07:36:05, Uri Blass wrote: >>the main difference between a good search based program and a knowledge based >>program is IMO not how to evaluate ONE position ACCURATE and right. >>its not a static feature ! >>Its a dynamic feature. >Hiarcs failed in the dynamic test against smirin. >It failed to evaluate fortress position as a draw. Nonsense. You did not read carefully. i said: >>the main difference between a good search based program and a knowledge based >>program is IMO not how to evaluate ONE position ACCURATE and right. NOT how to evaluate ONE.... NOT ! the difference is in how the programs handle a game, not a position. in a position, any program can be better. but chess is not solving a position. it is solving a game. the sum is more than its parts.- >Humans can know that it is a draw not based on static evaluation but based on >seeing that they can make no progress. the programs must find methods that can conquer with the eyes ! search is IMO NOT a weapon against eyes that can see. but having an idea is IMO a weapon. >I hope that hash tables are going to give my program another significant >improvement. > >Uri i wish you the best.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.