Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:23:03 05/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2002 at 06:30:59, stuart taylor wrote: >Is Shredder the biggest punisher of mistakes and innacuracies of the opponent? i have the feeling. it is very sensible for you making mistakes. it is not a tactics finder IMO. it also sees positional mistakes of you. but, it is ONE thing to see them, and another thing to use this for winning. i don't think shredder is a big plan maker. it behaves and remembers me much on genius in this field. >If so, that should make it quite interesting. Is it like an upgrade of genius? IMO. yes. in the moment. >You also make Hiarcs sound very tempting. >All independant of who actually wins more. the games with hiarcs, no matter who wins, no matter if the opponent if fritz or shredder or century or or or or or... are the best computerchess i have seen for YEARS by now. i am still wondering why this is. i can only imagine that mark has worked different way than the others. or that he has not copied the state of the art stuff the others did, but done something different. whatever. never i have seen those games. it reminds me on old times of computerchess, saitek machines versus novag, or fidelity versus mephisto ! wow !!! this is nice. and i wonder that nobody recoignized. people post results but nobody talks about the games or the evaluations. why ? would be interesting to talk about the different evaluations ! if you don't have hiarcs8 yet: buy it. there is no alternative IMO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.