Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding?

Author: Otello Gnaramori

Date: 13:18:03 05/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 06, 2002 at 13:25:48, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On May 06, 2002 at 06:33:48, Steve Maughan wrote:
>
>>Christophe,
>>
>>>"Knowledge" in the sense of positional evaluation (that's what most people
>>>think about when they talk about knowledge) makes for 10% of the strength of a
>>>chess program.
>>>
>>>Chess is 90% about tactics (which is a concept close to "search").
>>
>>I think it was Alekehine that said chess was 99% tactics - so maybe you're
>>giving too much weight to positional terms :-)).
>>
>>However, isn't it a little misleading to talk about percentages since you only
>>need to make one positional mistake to lose the game.  So if you make one
>>positional error every ten moves you're going to have a weak program.
>
>
>On the other hand, make just one tactical mistake in 100 moves and it is enough
>to lose as well...
>
>

I agree with Christophe 100%!
Chess is tactics, and making positional considerations is a good crutch we need
to cover our inability to read positions deep enough...in other words at the end
of the positional considerations there always will be a tactical balance!

w.b.r.
Otello



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.