Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Amd Thoroughbred benchtest

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 14:15:45 05/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 06, 2002 at 16:25:23, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>
>I know there are several here that are waiting for the next
>AMD release of the 0.13-micron processor. We have all been wondering
>what this will overclock to. I also want to upgrade my single cpu pc.
>
>I found this benchtest dissappointing. This processor he used crashed at 2100
>mhz. was stable at 2050 mhz. but this was with the vapochill unit. not sure how
>far it would overclock with air cooling.
>
>If we say the 1733 mhz amd is faster then the P4 2.4 gig running our chess
>software, then maybe a 2 gig amd thoroughbred will be comparable to a 3 gig
>P4 running our chess software, not sure, but looking forward to testing
>this .13-micron.
>
> http://www.overclockers.com.au/techstuff/a_amd_tbred/index.shtml
>
>kburcham

A P4 2.2Ghz is faster by about 10% than an AMD 1.53Ghz CPU.

WHICH MEANS:

A P4 2.4Ghz is faster by about 10% than an AMD 1.73Ghz CPU.


And remember, Intel announced the P4 2.53Ghz today.

I had the oppurtunity to "play" on a P4 2.4Ghz machine this weekend, and I am
sorry to report, Pentium is winning.  People just haven't realized it yet.

These new Pentiums are NICE.  For general "productivty" such as internet, music,
videos, these P4 are a LOT faster than my XP2100+.

And yes, the 2.4Ghz benches Crafty bout 8% faster than my 1.73Ghz.

Overclocking is another story all together.  But I don't overclock, and most
people, don't overclock.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.