Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 16:37:12 05/06/02

Go up one level in this thread

I've also often wondered if even GM annotators know exactly what they're talking
about, or put things in the right perspective. So you agree it seems!
 So, there are some games which are so deep searchwise that it is still not easy
to check out all variations, even with a top computer.
 So in such games, you would be claiming that it is great human searching
faculty at work, basically.

Anyway, the big question now is, what is the value of many GM written chess
books? All they can speak about is not-so-important things, and not very
provable things. All they do is to illustrate with a game in which the final
result is winning, when that knowledge is used, but it may not be BECAUSE of
that!
S.Taylor

• Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding? Roy Eassa 08:11:53 05/07/02
  • Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding? Miguel A. Ballicora 08:43:02 05/07/02
    • Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding? Roy Eassa 08:45:51 05/07/02
• Re: So which programs beat which, only due to superior chess understanding? Christophe Theron 19:34:11 05/06/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.