Author: Jorge
Date: 09:02:20 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 11:39:09, Slater Wold wrote: >On May 07, 2002 at 11:07:52, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On May 07, 2002 at 10:46:19, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 07, 2002 at 01:05:54, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>> >>>>This challenge is really rather silly, for several reasons. The machines being >>>>compared aren't identical (ignoring the obvious CPU/motherboard difference), >>>>it's not being done in any kind of controlled setting, and there's no guarantee >>>>that the programs/settings being used are exactly identical. Despite this, I'm >>>>interested to see what results you come up with. >>> >>>It's not silly at all. We are comparing one CPU makers "flagship" to another. >> >>If all the other hardware is identical, I'll buy it. But I doubt you and Aaron >>have identical components in your machines. >> >>>The software will be EXACTLY the same. I guarantee that. >> >>If you were testing both machines yourself, yes. But if it's you vs. Aaron, >>there are bound to be some differences in the software (and hardware), which >>make the results not 100% reliable. >> >>Interested to see the results anyway. > > >Well I have a *true* AMD 1.73Ghz. Aaron does not. > >Aaron lives about 2 hours from me. We've always talked about getting together >sometime, maybe this is the perfect oppurtunity. ;) What about the type of OS and RAM used, that should be a factor also. jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.