Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:03:33 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 12:24:19, K. Burcham wrote: > > > >when comparing latest releases between amd and intel, intel may win >in some benchtests-but close. amd only has 1733 mhz and intel has 2533 mhz. >amd is behind in mhz. if amd had same mhz, intel would be big loser. >and if a frog had wings---- > >in Tom's cpu benchtest: amd 1918 mhz beats intel 2755 mhz > amd 1733 mhz beats intel 2400 mhz. >http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q2/020506/p4b-09.html > >also here are some comments on benchtests between these two brands. >http://www.overclockers.com/tips974/ > >kburcham Ken, I think you're missing the point. Completly. We have AMDs "flagship", the 1.73Ghz. We have Intels "flagship", the 2.53Ghz. Which is faster? Go to one website, you see one thing. Go to another, you see something else. There is NO AMD 1918mhz. Any benches on that is crap. 99% of the computer buying public does not overclock. I don't overclock. Overclocking is out of the equation. Maybe you didn't read the original post, but I am not comparing money, value, mhz, anything like that. I am comparing one thing, and one thing only, PERFORMANCE.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.