Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:06:15 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 12:02:20, Jorge wrote: >On May 07, 2002 at 11:39:09, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On May 07, 2002 at 11:07:52, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On May 07, 2002 at 10:46:19, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On May 07, 2002 at 01:05:54, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>>> >>>>>This challenge is really rather silly, for several reasons. The machines being >>>>>compared aren't identical (ignoring the obvious CPU/motherboard difference), >>>>>it's not being done in any kind of controlled setting, and there's no guarantee >>>>>that the programs/settings being used are exactly identical. Despite this, I'm >>>>>interested to see what results you come up with. >>>> >>>>It's not silly at all. We are comparing one CPU makers "flagship" to another. >>> >>>If all the other hardware is identical, I'll buy it. But I doubt you and Aaron >>>have identical components in your machines. >>> >>>>The software will be EXACTLY the same. I guarantee that. >>> >>>If you were testing both machines yourself, yes. But if it's you vs. Aaron, >>>there are bound to be some differences in the software (and hardware), which >>>make the results not 100% reliable. >>> >>>Interested to see the results anyway. >> >> >>Well I have a *true* AMD 1.73Ghz. Aaron does not. >> >>Aaron lives about 2 hours from me. We've always talked about getting together >>sometime, maybe this is the perfect oppurtunity. ;) > >What about the type of OS and RAM used, that should be a factor also. > >jorge This will ALL be taken into consideration. ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.