Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:26:57 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 00:07:33, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>Gambit Tiger 2.0
>2x1533 amd mp
>1 gig ram
>192 megs hash
>Tiger.ctg book
>default settings
>
>[Event "ICC 90 30"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2002.05.06"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "xracer"]
>[Black "Petrovich"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ICCResult "White resigns"]
>[WhiteElo "2580"]
>[BlackElo "2529"]
>[Opening "French: Tarrasch, Botvinnik variation"]
>[ECO "C05"]
>[NIC "FR.17"]
>[Time "20:59:43"]
>[TimeControl "5400+30"]
>
>1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 b6 7. Nh3 Ba6 8.
>Bxa6 Nxa6 9. O-O Nc7 10. Qg4 Nb8 11. Nf3 h6 12. Nf4 g6 13. Be3 Nc6 14. Rfc1
>c4 15. b3 b5 16. Rc2 Be7 17. Rb1 Rb8 18. Rd1 Kd7 19. Ne1 Qg8 20. Ra1 Qh7 21.
>Qe2 Rhg8 22. b4 a5 23. a3 Ra8 24. Rca2 Ra7 25. f3 Rga8 26. Nh3 Ra6 27. Nf2
>R8a7 28. Qb2 Rb7 29. Qd2 Rba7 30. Qe2 Qh8 31. Nc2 axb4 32. Nxb4 Ra4 33. Nxc6
>Kxc6 34. Bc1 Qf8 35. Ng4 h5 36. Nf6 Bxa3 37. Bxa3 Rxa3 38. Qc2 Qa8 39. Rxa3
>Rxa3 40. Rb1 Qa5 41. Rc1 Ra2 42. Qb1 Qa3 43. h3 Rb2 44. Qa1 b4 45. cxb4 Qxa1
>46. Rxa1 c3 47. Rc1 Nb5 48. Kf1 Rxb4 49. Ke2 Rxd4 50. Ke3 Rb4 51. Kd3 Rb2
>52. Rc2 Rb1 53. Rxc3+ Nxc3 54. Kxc3 Rg1 55. g4 Rg3 56. gxh5 Rxf3+ 57. Kd4
>Rxf6 58. exf6 gxh5 59. Ke3 e5 60. Kd3 Kd7 61. Ke2 Ke6 62. Kf3 Kxf6 63. Kg3
>Kg5 64. Kf3 Kh4 65. Kg2 f5 {White resigns} 0-1
>
>
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: :)
>/tell petrovich good game
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: yes
>.i think you played very high level game with no errors
>(told Petrovich)
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: yes
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: you played without plan
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: Ra1-b1-d1-a1
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: Ne1?
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: only active plan was h2-h4
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: to break kingside]
>.which program does not know
>(told Petrovich)
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: otherwise Black has comfortable play
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: b3-b4?
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: you missed knight transfer into c2
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: to protect Ra1 and to hold a-file
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: understand me?
>.yes
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: when shall we play 3rd game?
>.thursday? ok with you
>(told Petrovich)
>Petrovich(GM) tells you: okay
>
>
>this was a completely different game compared to the first game.
>with Petrovich knowing the french very well, he closed the position.
>once the a-file was open, eval dropped.
>I see two problems here,
>1. this opening against a strong player with the lines that are in this book
>2. once the position was closed, the program made no improvements in its
>position with waisted moves. this gave the GM time to set up on the a-file with
>both rooks and queen. once set up, the attack started and the game was over.
>maybe this was the type of game that anti-human should have been on. not sure.
>kburcham
Yes, maybe antihuman would have helped.
I think the best use of antihuman is to set it on DURING the game if the
operator notices that the opponent tries to close the position.
Naturally that requires an external human intervention, so I'm not sure it is
fair.
Actually I would have to build this detection logic in the program itself. There
is already one, but it is aimed towards very obviously closed games. It would
not detect a more subtle buildup.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.