Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:44:10 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 11:11:38, William H Rogers wrote:
>On May 06, 2002 at 22:38:01, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>
>>You mean that Sargon I was using a SEE?
>>
>>Because as far as I know Sargon II and the next versions were not. They were
>>using a real QSearch instead, which made them much stronger.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>What Sargon I did with its exchange evaluator is to compile a list of all hits
>on square and then see had the most control it or its opponent. Very
>rudentmentary at most. It was very much like that proposed by David Levy in one
>of his earliest books on chess functions.
So I guess it was only used at the root of the search?
I think it would have been too expensive to use deeper in the search?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.