Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:03:24 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 10:21:14, James T. Walker wrote:
>Very disappointing performance so far by Hiarcs 8. Here are the 12 games played
>since yesterday afternoon when Hiarcs 8 arrived. Score vs Fritz 7 is favor
>Fritz 7 by 8-4. Hiarcs has not a single win so far in 12 games.
aha.
i wonder why you use blitz games.
why not 40/40 ?
or 60/60 ??
ok. your choice.
>[Event "Blitz:60'/Athlon 1.4G/512M"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2002.05.06"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Hiarcs 8"]
>[Black "Fritz 7"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[ECO "C17"]
>[Annotator "0.19"]
>[PlyCount "143"]
>[EventDate "2002.01.28"]
>
>{128MB, Hiarcs8.ctg. Athlon 1.4G/512M
>} 1. e4 {0} 1... e6 {1} 2. d4 {0} 2...
>d5 {1} 3. Nc3 {0} 3... Bb4 {1} 4. e5 {0} 4... c5 {0} 5. Bd2 {0} 5... Ne7 {0} 6.
>a3 {0} 6... Bxc3 {0} 7. Bxc3 {0} 7... Nbc6 {0} 8. Nf3 {0} 8... cxd4 {0} 9. Bxd4
>{0} 9... Nf5 {0} 10. c3 {0} 10... Bd7 {73} 11. Be2 {0} 11... O-O {
>last book move 163} 12. O-O {144kN/s 0.19/12 172} 12... Nfxd4 {0} 13. cxd4 {
>152kN/s 0.11/12 49} 13... Be8 {(f6) 33} 14. b4 {155kN/s 0.31/12 128} 14... a6 {
>131} 15. Qd2 {111kN/s 0.07/12 75} 15... f6 {77} 16. Qe3 {148kN/s 0.13/12 29}
>16... Bh5 {158} 17. exf6 {148kN/s -0.09/12 20} 17... Qxf6 {122} 18. Rad1 {
>95kN/s -0.06/13 0} 18... Rae8 {84} 19. Rfe1 {95kN/s -0.02/13 21} 19... Qf4 {109
>} 20. Rd3 {92kN/s -0.08/12 27} 20... Qxe3 {(Rf6) 37} 21. fxe3 {
>145kN/s 0.10/12 90} 21... Rc8 {82} 22. Rdd1 {90kN/s 0.09/12 0} 22... Ne7 {70}
>23. Ng5 {150kN/s -0.05/13 42} 23... Bxe2 {96} 24. Rxe2 {111kN/s -0.10/14 0}
>24... Rc6 {(Rf6) 78} 25. e4 {129kN/s -0.27/13 147} 25... h6 {0} 26. exd5 {
>64kN/s -0.25/14 93} 26... Nxd5 {51} 27. Ne4 {187kN/s -0.31/13 18} 27... b6 {113
>} 28. Ng3 {156kN/s -0.55/12 39} 28... Rc3 {27} 29. Rxe6 {181kN/s -0.50/13 112}
>29... Rxa3 {64} 30. Rd6 {43kN/s -0.91/13 296}
i did not yet replay this game, i will do so. but do you have an explanation
why the NPS is so less in move 30 ??
my hiarcs on 1200 mhz is doing much higher NPS, and even in your own
file, the program reached higher NPS.
whatever. i will replay the game with my hiarcs and maybe we find an
explanation.
maybe the position is difficult or another search reason or something alike.
i just wonder...
38. Rxg7 {47kN/s -1.01/12 40}
47 ??
14... exd4 {
>35kN/s 0.14/12 195}
35 kNPS ??
>58kN/s 0.30/13 30}
??
21. e4 {65kN/s 0.63/13 116}
NPS drops comletely !!
21... dxe4 {5} 22. Bxe4 {25kN/s 0.77/13 38
25 ?????
thats less than hiarcs8 is getting on my 500 mhz machine !
strange.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.