Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:34:24 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 14:03:24, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On May 07, 2002 at 10:21:14, James T. Walker wrote:
>
>>Very disappointing performance so far by Hiarcs 8. Here are the 12 games played
>>since yesterday afternoon when Hiarcs 8 arrived. Score vs Fritz 7 is favor
>>Fritz 7 by 8-4. Hiarcs has not a single win so far in 12 games.
>
>aha.
>
>i wonder why you use blitz games.
>why not 40/40 ?
>or 60/60 ??
>
>ok. your choice.
Game 60 autoplayed on two TB 1400's is no worse than 40/40. Nothing wrong with
playing game 60 on these machines.
>>[Event "Blitz:60'/Athlon 1.4G/512M"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "2002.05.06"]
>>[Round "1"]
>>[White "Hiarcs 8"]
>>[Black "Fritz 7"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[ECO "C17"]
>>[Annotator "0.19"]
>>[PlyCount "143"]
>>[EventDate "2002.01.28"]
>>
>>{128MB, Hiarcs8.ctg. Athlon 1.4G/512M
>>} 1. e4 {0} 1... e6 {1} 2. d4 {0} 2...
>>d5 {1} 3. Nc3 {0} 3... Bb4 {1} 4. e5 {0} 4... c5 {0} 5. Bd2 {0} 5... Ne7 {0} 6.
>>a3 {0} 6... Bxc3 {0} 7. Bxc3 {0} 7... Nbc6 {0} 8. Nf3 {0} 8... cxd4 {0} 9. Bxd4
>>{0} 9... Nf5 {0} 10. c3 {0} 10... Bd7 {73} 11. Be2 {0} 11... O-O {
>>last book move 163} 12. O-O {144kN/s 0.19/12 172} 12... Nfxd4 {0} 13. cxd4 {
>>152kN/s 0.11/12 49} 13... Be8 {(f6) 33} 14. b4 {155kN/s 0.31/12 128} 14... a6 {
>>131} 15. Qd2 {111kN/s 0.07/12 75} 15... f6 {77} 16. Qe3 {148kN/s 0.13/12 29}
>>16... Bh5 {158} 17. exf6 {148kN/s -0.09/12 20} 17... Qxf6 {122} 18. Rad1 {
>>95kN/s -0.06/13 0} 18... Rae8 {84} 19. Rfe1 {95kN/s -0.02/13 21} 19... Qf4 {109
>>} 20. Rd3 {92kN/s -0.08/12 27} 20... Qxe3 {(Rf6) 37} 21. fxe3 {
>>145kN/s 0.10/12 90} 21... Rc8 {82} 22. Rdd1 {90kN/s 0.09/12 0} 22... Ne7 {70}
>>23. Ng5 {150kN/s -0.05/13 42} 23... Bxe2 {96} 24. Rxe2 {111kN/s -0.10/14 0}
>>24... Rc6 {(Rf6) 78} 25. e4 {129kN/s -0.27/13 147} 25... h6 {0} 26. exd5 {
>>64kN/s -0.25/14 93} 26... Nxd5 {51} 27. Ne4 {187kN/s -0.31/13 18} 27... b6 {113
>>} 28. Ng3 {156kN/s -0.55/12 39} 28... Rc3 {27} 29. Rxe6 {181kN/s -0.50/13 112}
>>29... Rxa3 {64} 30. Rd6 {43kN/s -0.91/13 296}
>
>i did not yet replay this game, i will do so. but do you have an explanation
>why the NPS is so less in move 30 ??
Sometimes the recorded NPS don't match it's been that way in the Deep Fritz
interface for a while. Not sure what interface these games were played in but
the depth to time searched ratio seems ok.
As an opposite example look at moves 50. Nd4 (278 kN/s) and 54. g4 (251 kN/s)
This is the opposite as I don't believe a 1400 could get that NPS output.
Although in this case maybe there is something wrong but it also could be that
Hiarcs just got outsearched ;-)
Hiarcs 8 - Fritz 7
5rk1/6p1/pp2R2p/3n4/1P1P4/r5N1/6PP/3R2K1 w - - 0 1
Analysis by Hiarcs 8:
Search time 420 seconds.
30.Rd6 Ne3 31.Re1 b5 32.Rd7 Ra2 33.Nh5 Rxg2+ 34.Kh1 Rg6 35.Rxg7+ Rxg7 36.Nxg7
Nc2 37.Rg1 Kf7 38.Nf5 Nxb4 39.Nxh6+ Ke6
ยต (-0.91) Depth: 13/36 00:01:46 18059kN
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.