Author: James T. Walker
Date: 14:32:39 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 14:58:41, Jorge wrote: >On May 07, 2002 at 13:14:08, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>A score of 8-4 in favour of Fritz7 after only 12 Hiarcs8 games means >>statistically spoken almost nothing. Please check after 30-100 games. >>Kurt > >Well, yes- it is far too few games played, however, it a darn good start for >Fritzy! > >jorge Yes, and a very poor start for Hiarcs 8. After 4 games vs Junior 7, Junior 7 leads by 2.5-1.5. Hiarcs 8 finally got a win after 15 games!? I'm not impressed. So far it's not doing any better than Hiarcs 7.32. Of course more games are needed. But I don't believe I have to go to longer time controls to satisfy Hiarcs 8. If it only plays good at 40/2hours then it is useless to me. Nobody plays 40/2 anymore except SSDF and someday they will wake up and join the 21st century. Well here's hopeing that there is a turnaround and I have not wasted my money. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.