Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:53:59 05/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 15:50:32, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 07, 2002 at 15:34:24, Chessfun wrote: > >>On May 07, 2002 at 14:03:24, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On May 07, 2002 at 10:21:14, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>Very disappointing performance so far by Hiarcs 8. Here are the 12 games played >>>>since yesterday afternoon when Hiarcs 8 arrived. Score vs Fritz 7 is favor >>>>Fritz 7 by 8-4. Hiarcs has not a single win so far in 12 games. >>> >>>aha. >>> >>>i wonder why you use blitz games. >>>why not 40/40 ? >>>or 60/60 ?? >>> >>>ok. your choice. >> >> >>Game 60 autoplayed on two TB 1400's is no worse than 40/40. Nothing wrong with >>playing game 60 on these machines. > >game 60 is often faster time control than 40/40 espacially when there are games >of more than 80 moves. > >When the game is short there is no big difference but significant part of the >games that were posted were not short. > >Uri vollkommen richtig Uri. Of course Blitz is not the same as average time. especially not when many moves have been played. but i have looked into the games, there are even moves where hiarcs makes 9 or 14 or less NPS. i hope that the user interface produces wrong data. otherwise ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.