Author: blass uri
Date: 06:44:29 07/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 1998 at 09:36:44, Eran wrote: >On July 24, 1998 at 07:50:18, Jeff Anderson wrote: > >>Everyone has known for years that computers were dominant at Blitz chess. If my >>memory serves me correctly, Kasparov even lost to old Fritz 3 in several games a >>few years ago? So why does everyone act so amazed Rebel beat up on Anand in the >>blitz portion of their little match? >>In my mind Anand really won the match, because Rebel was not able to win either >>of the slow games, and I think the final game was an excellent example of the >>weaknesses of computers. >>Humans are still the best at chess with old fashioned tournament time controls. >> >>Jeff > >I remember Vishy Anand beat Fritz5 before but he could not beat Rebel10 well in >4 blitz games and 2 15 minutes games. Can you please account for those two >different scores? > >Well, Rebel10 seems to be a bit stronger than Fritz5 in fast games, right? We do not know because of the following reasons: 1)25 minutes per game is not 15 minutes per game 2)Anand could not learn Rebel10 and could learn fritz5 3)Maybe Rebel is better against humans but not against computers The only way to know is to do a match between Rebel10 and Fritz5 Uri > >Eran
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.