Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:41:13 05/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2002 at 05:42:46, stuart taylor wrote: Hi STUART! >THAT'S something QUITE different to the impression people are giving, really . >if its >true. Does that mean that at half an hour per move, it could be consistently >STRONGER than the other programs? i don't know. i do not have the time to make a game with 30' per move :-)) maybe you want to start a few games ?? >If so, I wouldn't bother upgrading from Hiarcs >8.0 for another 5-10 years, as it will only get better and better with faster >hardware, without further intervention, at Blitz too. depends. You want a good blitz program ? why don't you use fritz ? >And I'm prepared from the label "strongest" to mean when you leave it >thinking for half an hour or more. as hiarcs7.32 was, hiarcs 8 is IMO excellent for 30' per move. maybe you could start a few matches ?? > What could be better? Is this all true? Can that be tested? >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.