Author: stuart taylor
Date: 05:22:56 05/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2002 at 07:41:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 08, 2002 at 05:42:46, stuart taylor wrote: > >Hi STUART! > > >>THAT'S something QUITE different to the impression people are giving, > > >really . > > >>if its >>true. Does that mean that at half an hour per move, it could be consistently >>STRONGER than the other programs? > > > >i don't know. i do not have the time to make a game with 30' per move :-)) > >maybe you want to start a few games ?? > > > > >>If so, I wouldn't bother upgrading from Hiarcs >>8.0 for another 5-10 years, as it will only get better and better with faster >>hardware, without further intervention, at Blitz too. > > >depends. You want a good blitz program ? why don't you use fritz ? > >>And I'm prepared from the label "strongest" to mean when you leave it >>thinking for half an hour or more. > >as hiarcs7.32 was, hiarcs 8 is IMO excellent for 30' per move. >maybe you could start a few matches ?? > > > > >> What could be better? Is this all true? Can that be tested? >>S.Taylor I'd love to make tests, but I'm not set up for it at the momment. I'm living by my parents at the momment, and my own computer is not at this place, and also I don't have the (recent) programs (besides Tiger 14 and CM8K)or the 242 software, nor do I have two (identical?) computers. I used to test alot of programs manually for my own information, long before I came onto CCC. With blitz, I'm saying that when the speed of hardware has been multiplied a few times, then maybe the (then) antique Hiarcs 8.0 will be great at Blitz of then. Test positions too, at an hour per position, might be interesting. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.