Author: Tim Mirabile
Date: 07:46:50 07/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On July 23, 1998 at 22:53:01, Howard Exner wrote: >Here is a summary of Rebel's achievement vs humns at long >time controls. > >AEGON 95: TPR 2473 (Rebel7) P-90 Game 90'/30" 6 games >AEGON 96: TPR 2530 (Rebel8) P-166 Game 90'/30" 6 games >AEGON 97: TPR 2619 (Rebel9) P-200 Game 90'/30" 6 games Are these time controls for past AEGON's correct? >Dominican Republic > >Rebel 9 played 5 Fide Rated opponents at 40/2 then all/1 hr. on a P-225 > >Eddy De Los Santos (2190) 1-0 >Jose M. Dominguez (FM 2305) .5-.5 >Gustavo Hernandez (2320) 1-0 >Nelson Pinal (IM 2330) 1-0 >Ramon Mateo (IM 2415) 1-0 > >TPR =Rc+400(W-L)/N >TPR=2312+400(4)/5 >TPR=2632 > >Note: this tournament was 11 rounds. Rebel defeated Hiarcs and drew CM5000 >in this tournament. It also defeated 4 other participants who do not have a >fide rating, for a first place score of 10/11. > >Rebel 10(AMD-450) v Anand (.5-1.5) >TPR =2795+400(-1)/2 >TPR = 2595 > >Is Rebel's play against humans in the GM range? 400(W-L)/N, and the performance rating in general, is not very good in extreme cases (short events, extreme ratings). Otherwise I play a match vs. Kasparov, lose all games and get a 2400+ performance. If I can get the full crosstable for the Dominican Republic event, I can do the regular round robin rating calculations on it, which involve all participants, even those without FIDE ratings. Does it make sense to use the old AEGON events, which used old versions of Rebel with slow machines? This is a problem when trying to rate computers - they are moving targets. Humans can learn (kind of like a software upgrade), but they can't upgrade their hardware (yet). I guess we can use them, and say that Rebel's rating lags behind its true strength like a rapidly improving human's would.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.