Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 08:07:32 05/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2002 at 09:47:46, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Thorsten, >I have no control over what NPS Hiarcs produces. i hope it is NOT producing those low NPS. I have not seen them on my autoplayers so far. maybe its your machine? maybe it is automatically doing some diskscan overnight, or doing defrag while playing chess :-))) or it goes into energy saving mode :-)) >All games are auto232 and >"untouched by human hands". and the machine ? maybe the machine is doing some of the nice automatic stuff. i have once seen the machine of peter berger doing some automatical diskscan and defrag or whatever during a tournament :-))) >As usual you are way out in left field with no clue >of what you are talking about. sorry for that. don't wanted to attack you. but when i see those low NPS i get irritated. is this a problem for you ? but take my best wishes and my thanks for your work. > In any case, I have not given up on Hiarcs 8. thank you. >I know it is early and the number of games is small. I did not expect Hiarcs 8 >to top Fritz at Game/60' but I did expect it to show better than Hiarcs 7.32. >As of this moment I only have 24 games by Hiarcs 8 @ G/60' and it is tied with >Hiarcs 7.32 on my Elo list. Hiarcs 7.32 has over 400 games so of course I >cannot say that Hiarcs 8 is only equal to Hiarcs 7.32. I do not agree with your >"excuse" that I must play 1-3 minutes/move to see Hiarcs 8 play well. excuse is good. have you ever asked a programmer how he develops or tests his program ? >Even >Shredder plays very well at G/60' and I expect Hiarcs 8 to also play well at >that time control. >Jim ok - i think its a free world. you should be allowed to expect whatever you want. i wish you all the best for tomorrow.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.