Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 22:08:49 05/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 2002 at 19:30:41, Chritopher A. Morgan wrote: who believes such crap in a CCC forum. the intel p4s are 70% slower for the average chessprogram than a K7. note both do not scale lineair upwards. P4s worst. >Tom’s Hardware ran extensive tests comparing the AMD 2100+ with the new Intel >Pent 4/2533. Results were published May 6. Intel was superior in all tests. >Their summary follows: > > >The results of this test don't leave much room for doubt, while also not >offering a lot of surprise. In all 25 benchmark disciplines, the Intel Pentium >4/2533 is well ahead of the AMD Athlon XP 2100+. Together with 533 MHz RDRAM, >the P4 gains accordingly in performance through an FSB clock that has been >increased from 100 MHz to 133 MHz. The overclocking benchmarks show how far the >processors can be pushed. Not even an overclocked AMD Athlon XP 2100+ with a >water-cooling system can offer serious competition for the tuned Pentium 4/2800. >Here, it should be noted that the P4/2533 ran stably at 2800 MHz with a standard >CPU cooler. > >Times are getting tougher for AMD if they want to stay on top of things. The new >Thoroughbred core needs to be released soon and then we need to see some hefty >clock speed to keep up with Intel's Pentium 4. > >Christopher
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.