Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Opinion Poll Voting... Suggestions??

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:27:01 07/24/98

Go up one level in this thread


On July 24, 1998 at 15:28:47, Howard Exner wrote:

>On July 24, 1998 at 12:55:26, Tim Mirabile wrote:
>
>>On July 24, 1998 at 11:36:28, Howard Exner wrote:
>>
>>>Three days ago under the heading, Opinion Poll Idea,
>>>I outlined roughly an idea concerning weaknesses in chess
>>>computers. Any thoughts on that one?
>>
>>Ok, but since we can't have open ended questions, we need to come up with some
>>choices here, and that is something which may be best done by the programmers.
>
>I've cut and pasted my post from 7/22/98. Here it is ...
>
>Posted by Howard Exner on July 22, 1998 at 03:12:38:
>
>
>With all the recent discussion here about how strong computer chess
>programs may be and how they still have weaknesses to overcome a
>thought about an opinion poll occurred to me. It would be a programmers
>only poll worded something like, "Which of the three computer chess
>weaknesses are the most difficult to alleviate"? We would first need to
>make a list of those weaknesses and through discussions here refine it.
>Is the passed pawn blindness a tough one to program or is closed position
>strategy an insurmountable task? It would be interesting to read what
>programmers view as their big challenge to making their programs better.
>Coming up with the list of weaknesses could spark some lively debate. Did
>I just say "lively debate"? I don't know if this tranquil bunch is up
>for that :-)
>
>You may have missed it with all the Rebel-Anand excitement. It outlines
>as you say, the need to generate a list. I would be very interested
>in what the many programmers and those who play and observe these
>machines come up with as a list of weaknesses. A programmer's only vote
>might be worded something like, "Which of the following X weaknesses to
>you believe are the most difficult to translate into code?" A question
>for the entire group could be worded, "Which of the following X weaknesses
>do you feel are the most noticable when playing or observing computer games?"

I like the idea.  there are lots of alternatives, like bishop vs knight,
two pieces vs rook, two rooks vs queen, plus the other things I mentioned
in my first post a few mins ago...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.