Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 14:53:18 05/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2002 at 17:48:40, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On May 08, 2002 at 16:55:57, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >>On May 08, 2002 at 16:26:18, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >> >>>On May 08, 2002 at 13:04:58, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>I mean those that cause a return. >>>> >>>>Matthias. >>> >>>I think that mine is lower, more like 10-15% on the middlegame. >>>It is lower because I do store and probe in the qsearch? >>> >>>Maybe we can chose a set of positions, analyze them to a fix depth >>>an compare numbers. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Miguel >> >> >>Would many other parameters like nullmove, internal iter. deepening, >>aspiraration windows, move ordering, extensions, fut. pruning, pawn tables, etc >>not affect the meaning of the results ? >> >>Send me positions and say how to proceed. >>Send to xxxx@online.de, but replace "xxxx" with "mgemuh". >> >>Regards, >>Matthias. > >These are the positions I chose to run for 9 plies each. > >rnr3k1/p3qpp1/1p2b2p/1Bpp4/3P4/Q3PN2/PP3PPP/2R1K2R b K - bm Qb7;id "DCS.001"; >2r2qk1/r2n2p1/p3p2p/2pp4/8/Q3P3/PP2BPPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm e4;id "DCS.002"; >4q2k/2r1r1p1/4Pn1p/p1p2R2/P2pQ2P/1P1B1R2/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rxf6;id "DCS.003"; >r1b1r1k1/pp3ppp/2p4q/3pP2n/3P4/2PB1P1P/P1Q1N1P1/R3K2R w KQ - bm Qd2;id >"DCS.004"; >2r2rk1/1q1bbp1p/n2p1np1/1p1Pp3/1P2P3/4NN1P/3B1PP1/RB1QR1K1 w - - bm Bd3;id >"DCS.005"; >r2q1rk1/4bppp/p1b1pn2/1p1p4/3P1B2/1QN3PP/PP2PPB1/2R2RK1 b - - bm Qd7;id >"DCS.006"; >2r2rk1/pp1bRppp/1q3n2/n2p4/3P1B2/3B1N2/PP3PPP/2RQ2K1 w - - bm Ng5;id "DCS.007"; >2rn2k1/p2qnrpp/1p2p3/3pPp1P/1B1P1N2/P2Q2R1/2P2PP1/R3K3 b - - bm Rc4;id >"DCS.008"; >2r3k1/1b2ppb1/q2p1np1/2p3N1/1p2P1PQ/nP1PB2P/r1P1N1B1/2R2RK1 w - - bm Rxf6;id >"DCS.009"; >rn1qrbk1/1pp2ppp/8/p2bp3/Q7/P2PBNP1/1PR1PPBP/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxc7;id "DCS.010"; > >Attempts Hits (%) > Partial Perfect > >Probe in quies search > > 1 7987553 20.2 13.8 > 2 9549038 14.2 10.3 > 3 2659876 21.6 13.3 > 4 3459439 19.3 12.9 > 5 4987247 16.0 10.9 > 6 9928127 17.2 12.2 > 7 16195160 17.5 12.4 > 8 2137209 18.5 11.9 > 9 10904976 12.7 9.0 >10 6871937 17.8 12.1 >-------------------------- >Av. 7468056 17.5 11.9 > > >Probe only on regular search > > 1 3026432 32.3 23.1 > 2 4040161 24.2 18.0 > 3 1470444 29.8 18.9 > 4 1979177 29.2 20.5 > 5 2845284 26.8 18.9 > 6 4793760 25.7 19.1 > 7 9269009 26.0 19.4 > 8 1309214 29.0 19.2 > 9 5480272 21.1 15.1 >10 3365744 29.1 20.9 >-------------------------- >Av 3757950 27.3 19.3 > >These numbers are more similar to yours, probably. That indicates that >to compare the % of hits it should be taken into account if the program >probes in the quiescent search. > >Regards, >Miguel forgot to mention Hashtables 8Mb. Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.