Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 09:26:32 05/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2002 at 10:10:41, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >> >>These are the positions I chose to run for 9 plies each. >> >>rnr3k1/p3qpp1/1p2b2p/1Bpp4/3P4/Q3PN2/PP3PPP/2R1K2R b K - bm Qb7;id "DCS.001"; >>2r2qk1/r2n2p1/p3p2p/2pp4/8/Q3P3/PP2BPPP/2R2RK1 w - - bm e4;id "DCS.002"; >>4q2k/2r1r1p1/4Pn1p/p1p2R2/P2pQ2P/1P1B1R2/6P1/6K1 w - - bm Rxf6;id "DCS.003"; >>r1b1r1k1/pp3ppp/2p4q/3pP2n/3P4/2PB1P1P/P1Q1N1P1/R3K2R w KQ - bm Qd2;id >>"DCS.004"; >>2r2rk1/1q1bbp1p/n2p1np1/1p1Pp3/1P2P3/4NN1P/3B1PP1/RB1QR1K1 w - - bm Bd3;id >>"DCS.005"; >>r2q1rk1/4bppp/p1b1pn2/1p1p4/3P1B2/1QN3PP/PP2PPB1/2R2RK1 b - - bm Qd7;id >>"DCS.006"; >>2r2rk1/pp1bRppp/1q3n2/n2p4/3P1B2/3B1N2/PP3PPP/2RQ2K1 w - - bm Ng5;id "DCS.007"; >>2rn2k1/p2qnrpp/1p2p3/3pPp1P/1B1P1N2/P2Q2R1/2P2PP1/R3K3 b - - bm Rc4;id >>"DCS.008"; >>2r3k1/1b2ppb1/q2p1np1/2p3N1/1p2P1PQ/nP1PB2P/r1P1N1B1/2R2RK1 w - - bm Rxf6;id >>"DCS.009"; >>rn1qrbk1/1pp2ppp/8/p2bp3/Q7/P2PBNP1/1PR1PPBP/2R3K1 w - - bm Rxc7;id "DCS.010"; >> >>Attempts Hits (%) >> Partial Perfect >> >>Probe in quies search >> >> 1 7987553 20.2 13.8 >> 2 9549038 14.2 10.3 >> 3 2659876 21.6 13.3 >> 4 3459439 19.3 12.9 >> 5 4987247 16.0 10.9 >> 6 9928127 17.2 12.2 >> 7 16195160 17.5 12.4 >> 8 2137209 18.5 11.9 >> 9 10904976 12.7 9.0 >>10 6871937 17.8 12.1 >>-------------------------- >>Av. 7468056 17.5 11.9 >> >> >>Probe only on regular search >> >> 1 3026432 32.3 23.1 >> 2 4040161 24.2 18.0 >> 3 1470444 29.8 18.9 >> 4 1979177 29.2 20.5 >> 5 2845284 26.8 18.9 >> 6 4793760 25.7 19.1 >> 7 9269009 26.0 19.4 >> 8 1309214 29.0 19.2 >> 9 5480272 21.1 15.1 >>10 3365744 29.1 20.9 >>-------------------------- >>Av 3757950 27.3 19.3 >> >>These numbers are more similar to yours, probably. That indicates that >>to compare the % of hits it should be taken into account if the program >>probes in the quiescent search. > > > >I don't probe in QSearch(). > >8-ply, 8 MB >============================ >Hash hits : 251668 33 28 >Hash hits : 504212 29 19 >Hash hits : 743621 21 17 >Hash hits : 266742 22 16 >Hash hits : 235576 29 23 >Hash hits : 466574 25 19 >Hash hits : 2403800 15 13 >Hash hits : 282196 29 25 >Hash hits : 722941 21 14 >Hash hits : 840015 31 21 > >9-ply, 8 MB >============================ >Hash hits : 572580 29 23 >Hash hits : 1614924 28 20 >Hash hits : 1310428 18 12 >Hash hits : 880766 25 16 >Hash hits : 474257 26 20 >Hash hits : 1698397 30 19 >Hash hits : 2403800 15 13 (8-ply) >Hash hits : 848820 26 18 >Hash hits : 2197662 21 15 >Hash hits : 1655100 24 17 > > >Regards, >Matthias. Very similar numbers. Your average is 17.3% (std dev 3.4) and mine is 19.3% (std dev 2.0) when I do not probe on the qsearch. Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.