Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pawn ending === GM J.Speelman,1979 [test position]

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 10:36:32 05/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 10, 2002 at 10:26:12, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:

>                 GM J.Speelman,1979 [test position]
>                   [D]8/1p2k2p/8/P4K2/8/7P/8/8 w
>      King and pawn endings are always more difficult than first appear
>      and the intricacies of Jon Speelman's study would probably baffle
>      most grandmasters if they reached the position over the board.
>      1. Kg5 Kf7 2. Kh6 Kg8 3. h4 Kh8 4. Kh5 Kg8 5.Kg4 Kf8 6. Kf4 Ke8
>      7. Kg5 Kf7 8. Kf5 Ke7 9. Ke5 Kd7 10. Kf6 and thanks to the tempo
>      gained on move 3, White now wins the queen by a skewer after both
>      pawns promote. Paul Lamford,"British Chess Magazine",January 1986,page 28

I disagree, any good GM or a master, 2300 or above should solve this pawn
ending.

It's all technique and should be understood by strong players 2300 and up IMO.

King + Pawns vs King + Pawns should be _fully_ understood by _any_ player who
has mastered the "Basics" in chess, "Basics" meaning any player who has reached
2300 ELO.

Regards,
 Terry

P.S.

It's a good study, but should still be in the grasp of solid masters with
sufficient time on their clock.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.