Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 12:44:02 05/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2002 at 16:51:04, Michael Vox wrote: >On May 09, 2002 at 16:15:28, John Merlino wrote: > >>All I can say is that there are differences because they are different engines. >>I'm not sure that there even IS a better answer than that.... >> >>jm > >I am referring to the output generated that the engine analysis. Currently, CM >has a very strange format for analysis. You should really buy F7 and see how >they are doing it. Much better the CM Are you refering to the out put of the engines or to the format of the files which contains these analysis? I mean if you play 1.e4,e5 the first time and e4, c5 the second time e5 becomes a hidden move while you see both moves displayed at once in a chessbase or some other gui Your question may point at one or both of these points An other question I should ask on Johan what is the diference between the thinking lines and the output givven in analyses Then the question could be are you refering at the point that you can give engines a number of roots they should check in full analyses or that should refer to a database of played games in that position. Or are you only pointing at a blunder check of the engine Just showing your question only asks for other questions for now Rather then an answer. At least that's what I think Regards Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.