Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 13:57:11 05/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2002 at 16:51:04, Michael Vox wrote: >On May 09, 2002 at 16:15:28, John Merlino wrote: > >>All I can say is that there are differences because they are different engines. >>I'm not sure that there even IS a better answer than that.... >> >>jm > >I am referring to the output generated that the engine analysis. Currently, CM >has a very strange format for analysis. You should really buy F7 and see how >they are doing it. Much better the CM I think you are talking of the gui (CM) and not the engine now. If you take a look at ChessAssistant they manage to make output like you will find in books (interactive analysis) with WB-engines (also The King). The missing part from the engine is that it clear its hash table between moves so it would not benefit from analysis when the gui follow the path back and forth to give a tree-like output. This is the only thing I miss from The King as an analyze engine (that it don't keep its hash table between moves). It sure had been a advantage if CM also could display such analysis but maybe thats a bit outside what the gui's main purpose is. Odd Gunnar
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.