Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:31:04 05/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2002 at 15:13:04, George Sobala wrote: >Some results of Hiarcs8 v CM8000(CMFun personality) at various time controls, >on an 800MHz Duron, 16Mb hash each, Hiarcs with own book, CMFun with Fritz6's. > >At G/2' blitz: > >Hiarcs8 +67 -38 =35 (60.36%) If you don't mind could you check how many of these were losses by CMFun on time?. >At G/30': > >Hiarcs8 +15 -16 =10 (48.78%) > >At 120'/40+60'/20+30': > >Hiarcs8 +0 -2 =1 > >Combining the two slower time controls: > >Hiarcs8 +15 -18 =11 > >So contrary to my and others' original impressions, Hiarcs8 seems to perform >better at shorter time controls than longer. > >I also wonder whether it might do better in single-computer engine matches with >no pondering, than standard two-machine auto232 games: is it out-pondered by >other engines? These games you played were on a single PC. Did you have pondering on or off? Chessmaster don't ponder in a chessbase GUI. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.