Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:46:00 05/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2002 at 17:35:28, Ian Aston wrote: >On May 11, 2002 at 16:31:04, Chessfun wrote: > >>On May 11, 2002 at 15:13:04, George Sobala wrote: >> >>>Some results of Hiarcs8 v CM8000(CMFun personality) at various time controls, >>>on an 800MHz Duron, 16Mb hash each, Hiarcs with own book, CMFun with Fritz6's. >>> >>>At G/2' blitz: >>> >>>Hiarcs8 +67 -38 =35 (60.36%) >> >> >>If you don't mind could you check how many of these were losses by CMFun on >>time?. >> >> >>>At G/30': >>> >>>Hiarcs8 +15 -16 =10 (48.78%) >>> >>>At 120'/40+60'/20+30': >>> >>>Hiarcs8 +0 -2 =1 >>> >>>Combining the two slower time controls: >>> >>>Hiarcs8 +15 -18 =11 >>> >>>So contrary to my and others' original impressions, Hiarcs8 seems to perform >>>better at shorter time controls than longer. >>> >>>I also wonder whether it might do better in single-computer engine matches with >>>no pondering, than standard two-machine auto232 games: is it out-pondered by >>>other engines? >> >> >>These games you played were on a single PC. Did you have pondering on or off? >>Chessmaster don't ponder in a chessbase GUI. > > >The King engine will ponder under ChessBase Hiarcs GUI if it is converted to a >UCI engine with wb2uci converter. It also seems to handle short incremental time >controls ok, such as 1'+1'', whereas as a winboard engine it seems to lose on >time. Don't know about G/2' though. Thanks for that info. I haven't run any CM personality in any of the UCI interfaces, Fritz 7, Shredder 6 or Hiarcs 8 yet. What is the wb2uci converter and where can I download it?. Thanks. Sarah. >> >>Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.