Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:15:07 05/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2002 at 00:58:47, George Sobala wrote: >After reading the replies to my previous post I decided a rematch was in order: >CMFun had been losing a significant number of games on time, and I had not heard >of the wb2uci adapter before. > >So, a rematch. CMFun now running through wb2uci, 16Mb hash, 800MHz Duron, 2' >Blitz: > >Hiarcs8 +43 -45 =20 (49.07%) My last comment would be at 2' game hash could be a lot lower than 16 mb, which would also help. As low as maybe 2 mb, tts=2097152, ttu=3. Only CMFun games I ever ran at fast controls were these; http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/blitz.html However now as by your statements it don't lose on time with wb2uci then maybe it's time to run some CM engines in my lightning lists. Sarah. >CMFun performed much better with this adapter (previous match was using >Inbetween and the old Chessbase Winboard adapter). > >Incidentally, although my and others' results seem to show Hiarcs8 to be >slightly inferior to the other leading programs, I am not disappointed with my >purchase. I often use engines for observing games or analysis, and so far, >Hiarcs8 does seem to be more likely to prefer the lines chosen by GMs - but I >don't have statistics to back this up! (I understand Vishy Anand was said to >prefer Hiarcs7.32 over other chess engines for analysis.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.