Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 04:17:12 05/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2002 at 06:42:06, stuart taylor wrote: >On May 12, 2002 at 01:20:35, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>I do not understand why people all over the world claim that Hiarcs8 is a bad >>engine after playing some games only [hundred of games are needed to say >>something concrete]. In my opinion Hiarcs8 is a very strong chess program, it >>now belongs to the top five. >> >>Please also have a look at >>http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/42548.htm >> >>Kurt > >I don't think ANYONE was claiming it's not in the top five. >S.Taylor I remember people back in 2000 saying the same thing about Nimzo 8, but if you have a powerful P.C. both are rated above 2650 against Humans and other programs. What more do you expect? The criticism for Nimzo 8 was so bad, that the SSDF did NOT even bothered to test it with their newer Athlon 1.2 Ghz what a pity. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.