Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Artificial (un)intelligence / (un)conscious (Att. Dr.Hyatt)

Author: Janosch Zwerensky

Date: 11:42:58 05/12/02

Go up one level in this thread



>I'd suggest reading Asimov's many Robot short stories developing his Laws of
>Robotics.

In principle, Asimov's laws of robotics are fine, but I am not sure that we
could implement them if we some day built an actual machine of human-like
intelligence.
The reason for this is that I think that there is no practical way of
hand-coding all the knowledge the robot would need to even *understand* the
three laws, let alone follow them with any degree of accuracy, which means it
would have to build the mental structures needed for comprehending such things
essentially by learning. Once the robot *could* understand the three laws I'd
predict that *we* would not understand the mind it had developed in sufficient
detail any more to know exactly what we were coding into it when we tried to
imprint its mind with the three laws...
In addition to that, that learning phase would likely not work anyway if the
robot did not have a different, easier-to-implement system of motivations (than
the one induced by the three laws) in the first place. I don't think it is
likely that one could turn these off easily when it's "grown up" without
damaging the robot's mind.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.