Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:04:58 05/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2002 at 22:50:05, Terry McCracken wrote: >On May 12, 2002 at 22:21:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I started a long long time control match of approximately 4 minutes per move and >>HIARCS 8 is winning 2 games and ZERO lost so far, against one of the very best >>program available Fritz 7. It seems to me that HIARCS 8 is an excellent program >>at longer time control and could also be used wisely in correspondence. >> >>PS: Once the newer Pentium 3.0 Ghz becomes available this program will be among >>the very best available , and that could be in another 6 six months. >> >> >>Pichard. > >This is my theory, but no one buys it! It's "Common Sense" IMO. Regardless how >fast a programme may be it will hit a "Wall" with iterative deepening as the >tree grows larger exponentially. So Hiarcs will catch up over time, regardless >of it's slow node count (slowest I've Seen) and lower iterations in fast games. > >Time will tell;) > > Terry And no, I don't propose that Hiarcs a superior "Branching Factor", but I think it requires more speed/time to reach it's potential. This is a handicap in fast games and slow computers. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.