Author: Chuck
Date: 04:25:13 05/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 2002 at 00:57:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 12, 2002 at 22:21:41, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I started a long long time control match of approximately 4 minutes per move and >>HIARCS 8 is winning 2 games and ZERO lost so far, against one of the very best >>program available Fritz 7. It seems to me that HIARCS 8 is an excellent program >>at longer time control and could also be used wisely in correspondence. >> >>PS: Once the newer Pentium 3.0 Ghz becomes available this program will be among >>the very best available , and that could be in another 6 six months. >> >> >>Pichard. > >2-0 is not a significant result. > >I do not believe that hiarcs is better at longer time control. > >It is possible that programs that have better positional understanding are going >to get better results at slower time control(I do not know) but Hiarcs has not >better positional understanding based on other posts. > >There are positions when it may be better than other programs but there are also >positions when it may be worse than other programs. > >Uri OK, so Pichard has posted evidence to support his position and now you try to discount it totally with logical arguments. Well, his evidence is concrete, so perhaps you should think a little harder before you disregard and disrespect his result. For this reason, I think your logic is not good. You didn't present anything to support what you "believe". Yes, it is too small a result to have any significance but still it is material evidence. Chuck
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.