Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Rating lists - which program is more accurate?

Author: Aloisio Ponti Lopes

Date: 06:25:20 05/13/02

I used the same database but got two different results using Fritz 7 and
Elostat:

Chessbase elo ("create initial elo list" from Fritz 7 database window):

1 Chess Tiger 2696
2 Fritz       2590
3 Gandalf     2534
4 SOS         2526
5 Hiarcs      2521
6 Nimzo       2486
7 Shredder    2483
8 Junior      2473
9 Chessmaster 2457
10 CSTal      2456
11 AnMon      2453

Elostat elo

1 Fritz       2563
2 Chess Tiger 2558
3 Shredder    2486
4 Hiarcs      2481
5 Gandalf     2446
6 Yace        2399
7 SOS         2393
8 Crafty      2393
9 Chessmaster 2384
10 Junior     2379
11 Little Goliath 2338
-----------------------------------------------------
I guess the Elostat list is more accurate ? Why ?

A. Ponti

• Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? Jeroen van Dorp 08:54:53 05/13/02
  • Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? Aloisio Ponti Lopes 18:18:28 05/13/02
• Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? Peter Fendrich 08:39:02 05/13/02
• Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? David Dahlem 07:25:46 05/13/02
  • Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? Uri Blass 07:49:19 05/13/02
    • Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? James T. Walker 08:21:30 05/13/02
      • Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate? Engin Üstün 17:11:07 05/13/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.