Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: HIARCS 8 vs Fritz 7 , Here are The FIRST 2 GAMES !

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 06:58:13 05/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 13, 2002 at 09:11:02, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 13, 2002 at 05:51:24, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On May 12, 2002 at 23:04:58, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On May 12, 2002 at 22:50:05, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 12, 2002 at 22:21:41, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I started a long long time control match of approximately 4 minutes per move and
>>>>>HIARCS 8 is winning 2 games and ZERO lost so far, against one of the very best
>>>>>program available Fritz 7. It seems to me that HIARCS 8 is an excellent program
>>>>>at longer time control and could also be used wisely in correspondence.
>>>>>
>>>>>PS: Once the newer Pentium 3.0 Ghz becomes available this program will be among
>>>>>the very best available , and that could be in another 6 six months.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pichard.
>>>>
>>>>This is my theory, but no one buys it! It's "Common Sense" IMO. Regardless how
>>>>fast a programme may be it will hit a "Wall" with iterative deepening as the
>>>>tree grows larger exponentially. So Hiarcs will catch up over time, regardless
>>>>of it's slow node count (slowest I've Seen) and lower iterations  in fast games.
>>>>
>>>>Time will tell;)
>>
>>
>>>> Terry
>>
>>Terry, I believe you are in the right track, ( you hit the nail right on its
>>head).
>>
>>Jorge
>>
>>>
>>>And no, I don't propose that Hiarcs a superior "Branching Factor", but I think
>>>it requires more speed/time to reach it's potential.
>>>
>>>This is a handicap in fast games and slow computers.
>>>
>>>Terry
>>
>>On May 13, 2002 at 00:57:06, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On May 12, 2002 at 22:21:41, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>I started a long long time control match of approximately 4 minutes per move and
>>>>HIARCS 8 is winning 2 games and ZERO lost so far, against one of the very best
>>>>program available Fritz 7. It seems to me that HIARCS 8 is an excellent program
>>>>at longer time control and could also be used wisely in correspondence.
>>>>
>>>>PS: Once the newer Pentium 3.0 Ghz becomes available this program will be among
>>>>the very best available , and that could be in another 6 six months.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pichard.
>>>
>>>2-0 is not a significant result.
>>>
>>>I do not believe that hiarcs is better at longer time control.
>>>
>>>It is possible that programs that have better positional understanding are going
>>>to get better results at slower time control(I do not know) but Hiarcs has not
>>>better positional understanding based on other posts.
>>>
>>>There are positions when it may be better than other programs but there are also
>>>positions when it may be worse than other programs.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>If it was based on position then it would have lost the second game, since it is
>>the same opening but with the black pieces.
>>
>>
>>
>>Hiarcs 8 (2700) - Fritz 7 (2715) [E86]
>>Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 120'/30+120'/30+30' My Place (1), 12.05.2002
>>
>>W=13.2 ply; 125kN/s
>>B=14.9 ply; 686kN/s
>> 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 3.¤c3 ¥g7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.¥e3 e5 7.¤ge2 c6 8.£d2 ¤bd7
>>9.0-0-0 a6 10.¢b1 b5 11.¤c1 White last book move 11...£e7 12.dxe5  0.96/13  9:27
>> dxe5 Black last book move 13.¤b3  0.96/13  8:26  £b4  0.56/14  7:41  14.£d6
>>1.08/12  5:16  £xd6  0.75/16  6:30  15.¦xd6  1.08/13  3:26  b4 (¤b8)  0.81/16
>>7:43  16.¤a4  1.40/14  6:06  ¤e8  1.09/17  12:25  17.¦d2  1.48/13  4:21  f5
>>1.16/16  9:03  18.¤a5 (¥d3)  1.53/13  6:22  18...fxe4  0.78/15  5:31  19.¤xc6
>>1.59/12  3:00  ¤ef6  0.81/14  4:40  20.c5 (¤xb4)  1.77/12  6:41  20...exf3 (¢h8)
>> 1.00/14  4:53  21.gxf3  1.84/12  5:40  ¥b7 (b3)  1.25/15  10:57  22.¤e7+
>>3.36/13  6:47  ¢f7  2.00/16  5:16  23.c6  3.40/13  5:05  ¢xe7  2.41/14  5:41
>>24.cxb7  4.15/13  5:29  ¦ab8 (¦ad8)  2.84/14  5:31  25.¥xa6  4.14/13  5:28  e4
>>(b3)  3.41/14  24:04  26.¥f4  5.35/12  7:13  ¢e6 (b3)  3.34/12  1:49  27.¥xb8
>>5.53/11  6:28  ¦xb8  3.50/14  1:38  28.fxe4  5.52/13  6:37  ¥h6  3.81/14  1:36
>>29.¦d4  5.63/14  8:58  b3  3.84/14  1:54  30.axb3 (¦hd1)  5.78/13  4:29
>>30...¥f4  3.34/13  1:36  31.h3  5.85/13  3:39  ¢e7 (¥e3)  3.53/14  3:24  32.¦c4
>>5.97/13  4:10  ¥e5 (g5)  3.84/15  8:10  33.¦d1  6.17/13  3:07  ¥f4 (g5)  4.44/14
>> 4:27  34.¤c3  6.65/13  3:42  h5 (¥e5)  4.94/13  2:50  35.¦c8  7.58/12  3:22
>>¢e6 (g5)  5.37/13  3:23  36.¤b5  8.57/12  2:26  ¢e5  5.66/12  3:02  37.¤a7 (¦e1)
>> 9.91/13  3:36  37...¢xe4  6.37/14  16:52  38.¤c6  10.05/12  2:31  ¥h2 (¢f5)
>>7.69/13  14:31  39.¤xb8  13.70/12  3:44  ¤xb8  8.97/14  2:26  40.¥d3+  13.97/12
>>3:22  ¢f3  9.44/14  3:15  41.¥xg6  14.41/12  3:24  ¤fd7 (¥e5)  11.91/14  8:52
>>1-0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Fritz 7 (2700) - Hiarcs 8 (2690) [E86]
>>Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 120'/30+120'/30+30' My Place (2), 12.05.2002
>>
>>W=15.4 ply; 694kN/s
>>B=12.9 ply; 125kN/s
>> 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 3.¤c3 ¥g7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.¥e3 e5 7.¤ge2 c6 8.£d2 ¤bd7
>>9.0-0-0 a6 10.¢b1 b5 11.¤c1 White last book move 11...exd4 12.¥xd4 ¦e8 13.¤b3
>>¥f8 14.h4 b4 15.¤e2 a5 16.h5 c5 17.¥e3 a4 18.¤bc1 ¤xh5 19.¥g5 ¥e7 20.¥xe7 £xe7
>>21.g4 ¥b7  -0.65/13  17:59  22.gxh5  0.88/16  17:54  ¥xe4+  -0.54/13  10:34
>>23.fxe4  1.03/16  16:07  £xe4+  -0.52/13  11:05  24.¤d3  0.91/16  15:32  £xh1
>>-0.44/13  31:38  25.¤ef4  0.91/14  4:45  £h4  -0.38/12  9:16  26.¥g2  0.97/13
>>2:04  ¦ac8 (¦a6)  -0.33/12  9:03  27.hxg6  1.28/13  3:33  hxg6  -0.02/12  17:44
>>28.¦h1  1.03/13  2:31  £f6 (£g3)  0.28/13  8:57  29.¥b7 (¥h3)  1.56/14  3:28
>>29...¦cd8 (¦b8)  0.00/12  2:14  30.¥c6 (£h2)  1.53/14  3:18  30...a3 (¤b6)
>>0.00/11  2:00  31.b3 (£h2)  1.81/14  3:50  31...£g7  0.17/12  4:57  32.£g2 (£f2)
>> 1.84/14  4:20  32...¢f8 (¦f8)  0.34/12  5:58  33.£g5 (¤d5)  1.94/13  3:09
>>33...¢g8  0.16/12  12:52  34.¦h2 (¦g1)  1.75/13  2:53  34...£f6  0.04/11  2:45
>>35.£h6  1.84/14  3:03  £g7  0.17/12  3:51  36.£h3 (£h4)  1.84/15  2:26  36...¦e7
>> 0.02/12  1:56  37.¤d5 (¤h5)  1.72/15  5:19  37...¦e6  0.00/11  1:00  38.¤c7
>>(¤5f4)  1.72/15  3:59  38...¦e7  0.00/13  2:55  39.¥xd7 (¤d5)  1.66/15  3:27
>>39...¦exd7  0.00/14  3:49  40.¤d5  1.66/16  6:02  £d4 (f5)  0.00/12  2:27
>>41.¦h1 (£h7+)  1.72/14  2:45  41...¢f8 (f5)  0.10/13  5:05  42.£h6+  2.13/15
>>3:34  £g7  0.54/15  16:37  43.£g5  2.53/16  2:46  £d4  0.52/13  2:37  44.¦h3
>>2.56/15  1:42  ¢g7  0.52/13  3:08  45.£h6+  2.38/15  2:42  ¢g8  0.52/6  0
>>46.¦f3  2.16/15  2:26  £g7  0.52/13  3:35  47.¤f6+ (£g5)  2.16/14  1:45
>>47...¢f8  0.41/13  1:40  48.¤xd7+  2.31/15  2:52  ¦xd7  0.42/13  2:35  49.£f4
>>(£h2)  2.09/15  4:32  49...f5 (£h8)  0.45/12  3:37  50.¦e3  2.22/15  4:30  ¢f7
>>0.40/13  2:07  51.£h4  2.25/16  4:49  £f6 (g5)  0.25/13  2:44  52.£h7+ (£h1)
>>1.84/17  6:43  52...£g7  0.19/14  1:50  53.£h1  1.56/18  24:33  £d4  0.19/14
>>4:00  54.£h6 (£h3)  1.56/16  20:03  54...£g7  0.00/14  1:57  55.£h2  -0.12/18
>>16:45  ¦e7  0.00/14  4:20  56.¦g3 (¦xe7+)  0.00/17  7:09  56...¦e6 (£d4)
>>-0.13/12  3:36  57.¦g2 (£f2)  0.56/16  5:03  57...£d4  -0.23/12  3:10  58.£h7+
>>0.25/16  4:03  ¢f8 (£g7)  -0.17/13  3:44  59.£h6+  0.00/16  6:18  ¢e8 (¢e7)
>>-0.02/14  7:20  60.¤c1 (¦d2)  0.22/17  7:15  60...£e4+  -0.68/13  1:55  61.¦c2
>>0.13/17  2:26  f4  -0.68/13  1:04  62.£h3  0.22/15  37  f3 (¢d7)  -0.67/12  1:00
>> 63.¤d3  0.00/15  1:08  g5 (¢d7)  -0.67/12  59  64.¦d2  0.00/13  32  g4
>>-0.84/11  57  65.£h4 (£h8+)  -0.44/13  1:38  65...£g6  -1.47/10  40  66.£h8+
>>(£f2)  -0.97/13  1:55  66...¢f7  -1.76/11  47  67.£c8  -0.78/12  40  ¢g7 (¦e1+)
>>-2.01/11  53  68.£b7+  -1.09/12  46  £f7  -2.49/11  35  69.£c6 (£xf7+)  -1.62/13
>> 1:06  69...g3  -4.07/10  42  70.¦d1  -2.25/12  49  ¦g6  -4.33/10  36  71.¢c1
>>(£d5)  -2.62/12  1:30  71...g2  -5.20/11  40  72.¦g1  -2.94/13  30  f2  -5.45/11
>> 34  73.¤xf2  -3.19/13  20  £xf2 (£f4+)  -5.70/11  44  74.£d7+  -3.53/13  1:19
>>¢f6  -6.26/12  43  75.£xd6+  -3.56/13  1:12  ¢g5  -6.26/11  31  76.£d2+ (¦xg2+)
>>-5.31/13  26  76...£xd2+  -12.25/15  27  77.¢xd2  -6.56/17  4  ¢f4  -12.74/16
>>27  78.¢e2  -8.28/19  33  ¢g3  -12.99/15  29  79.¢e3 (¢d3)  -9.62/16  15
>>79...¦e6+  -#16/13  7  80.¢d3 (¢d2)  -8.56/17  52  0-1
>
>
>Here is translation of the important part of the first game and the second game
>to normal notation.
>
>I had to translate strange notations like £h4 to Qh4
>
Sorry, I chose the wrong notation format it will be better for the next games.
Thanks for your translation.



>Fritz 7 (2700) - Hiarcs 8 (2690) [E86]
>Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 120'/30+120'/30+30' My Place (2), 12.05.2002
>
>W=15.4 ply; 694kN/s
>B=12.9 ply; 125kN/s

>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.Be3 e5 7.Nge2 c6 8.Qd2 Nbd7
>9.0-0-0 a6 10.Kb1 b5 11.Nc1 Qe7 [11...exd4 12.Bxd4 Re8 13.Nb3 Bf8 14.h4 b4
>15.Ne2 a5 16.h5 c5 17.Be3 a4 18.Nbc1 Nxh5 19.Bg5 Be7 20.Bxe7 Qxe7 21.g4 Bb7
>22.gxh5 Bxe4+ 23.fxe4 Qxe4+ 24.Nd3 Qxh1 25.Nef4 Qh4 26.Bg2 Rac8 27.hxg6 hxg6
>28.Rh1 Qf6 29.Bb7 Rcd8 30.Bc6 a3 31.b3 Qg7 32.Qg2 Kf8 33.Qg5 Kg8 34.Rh2 Qf6
>35.Qh6 Qg7 36.Qh3 Re7 37.Nd5 Re6 38.Nc7 Re7 39.Bxd7 Rexd7 40.Nd5 Qd4 41.Rh1 Kf8
>42.Qh6+ Qg7 43.Qg5 Qd4 44.Rh3 Kg7 45.Qh6+ Kg8 46.Rf3 Qg7 47.Nf6+ Kf8 48.Nxd7+
>Rxd7 49.Qf4 f5 50.Re3 Kf7 51.Qh4 Qf6 52.Qh7+ Qg7 53.Qh1 Qd4 54.Qh6 Qg7 55.Qh2
>Re7 56.Rg3 Re6 57.Rg2 Qd4 58.Qh7+ Kf8 59.Qh6+ Ke8 60.Nc1 Qe4+ 61.Rc2 f4 62.Qh3
>f3 63.Nd3 g5 64.Rd2 g4 65.Qh4 Qg6 66.Qh8+ Kf7 67.Qc8 Kg7 68.Qb7+ Qf7 69.Qc6 g3
>70.Rd1 Rg6 71.Kc1 g2 72.Rg1 f2 73.Nxf2 Qxf2 74.Qd7+ Kf6 75.Qxd6+ Kg5 76.Qd2+
>Qxd2+ 77.Kxd2 Kf4 78.Ke2 Kg3 79.Ke3 Re6+ 80.Kd3] 12.dxe5 dxe5 13.Nb3 Qb4 14.Qd6
>Qxd6 15.Rxd6 b4 16.Na4 Ne8 17.Rd2 f5 18.Na5 fxe4 19.Nxc6 Nef6 20.c5 exf3 21.gxf3
>Bb7 22.Ne7+ Kf7 23.c6 Kxe7 24.cxb7 Rab8 25.Bxa6 e4 26.Bf4 Ke6 27.Bxb8 Line
>
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.