Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rating lists - which program is more accurate?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:49:19 05/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 13, 2002 at 10:25:46, David Dahlem wrote:

>On May 13, 2002 at 09:25:20, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:
>
>>I used the same database but got two different results using Fritz 7 and
>>Elostat:
>>
>>Chessbase elo ("create initial elo list" from Fritz 7 database window):
>>
>>1 Chess Tiger 2696
>>2 Fritz       2590
>>3 Gandalf     2534
>>4 SOS         2526
>>5 Hiarcs      2521
>>6 Nimzo       2486
>>7 Shredder    2483
>>8 Junior      2473
>>9 Chessmaster 2457
>>10 CSTal      2456
>>11 AnMon      2453
>>
>>Elostat elo
>>
>>1 Fritz       2563
>>2 Chess Tiger 2558
>>3 Shredder    2486
>>4 Hiarcs      2481
>>5 Gandalf     2446
>>6 Yace        2399
>>7 SOS         2393
>>8 Crafty      2393
>>9 Chessmaster 2384
>>10 Junior     2379
>>11 Little Goliath 2338
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>I guess the Elostat list is more accurate ? Why ?
>>
>>A. Ponti
>
>I thik Elostat is more accurate because it takes into account the rating of each
>engines opponents.
>
>Regards
>Dave

I do not know which is more accurate but Elostat is not accurate and
a program can lose rating based on it's calculations if it wins opponents that
are 1000 elo weaker.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.