Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 90% of (comp losses vs GM) are comp castle kingside (O-O)

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:10:36 05/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On May 13, 2002 at 16:52:20, Jonathan Lee wrote:

>This seems to be a glaring statistic in pattern recognition on comp vs GM.
>Softwares include Fritz, Junior, Chess Tiger, Shredder, Deeper Blue and Conners.
>
>Only 2 games (that I know of) has castled queenside and the comp. lost; they are
>(Piket vs. Junior 5.6 GHZ) & (Wiel vs. Fritz 300 MHZ).
>
>The rest computer has castled kingside (almost 91 percent).
>
>73 percent of the lost games are both human & comp. castled kingside.
>
>Interesting to note here is there's a book called "How To Beat Your Dad in
>Chess" by British GM Murray Chandler where it has about 47 deadly checkmates and
>3 draws.  More than 80 percent (40 out of 50) involve castling kingside.
>However, the softwares today are more sophisticated to understand these
>positions.  The book will probably not help, but it's worth a try.
>Jonathan (151 message)
>PS When is Kramnik vs Fritz (if ever)?


The only question is "is this a causal relationship?"

The answer is probably not.  It probably is a statistical oddity caused
by the fact that most games result in kingside castling...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.