Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:21:20 05/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2002 at 09:11:20, stuart taylor wrote: >On May 14, 2002 at 06:25:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 14, 2002 at 06:11:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>I always wondered if Fritz 7 with longer time control = more powerful machine >>>could play better ?! >>> >>> >>>Hiarcs 8 (2700) - Fritz 7 (2715) [E86] >>>Athlon 1.2 Ghz, 120'/30+120'/30+30' My Place (1), 12.05.2002 >>> >>>W=13.2 ply; 125kN/s >>>B=14.9 ply; 686kN/s > >>>Here are some additional games where I increased the 2nd second time control in >>>the middlegage stage to 6 minutes per move. It is interesting to notice that >>>the longer you let HIARCS 8 think per move the better it gets. >> >>It is truth for all programs without bugs. >> >>Uri > >Athlon 1.2 Ghz. is not much more than half the speed of the top now. So you >could have at least doubled the time alootment. > >Uri, but is it not more true about some programs than others? >And whatwas the result with 6 min per move? (though I don't see anything special >in that at all. Normally I think it often takes longer in middle game, in >tournament timed games, and it is not the fastest hardware anymore (I'm sorry to >make you feel bad. Athlon 1.2 is still great, and you should stick with it for >atleast another year or longer, but statistically, it's not fairest to Hiarcs if >Hiarcs is meant to be what we are suggesting, but you can always give even much >longer time controls, which would be equivelant to 2-4 Ghz. at tournament >timing!). >S.Taylor I did not buy Hiarcs8 and my hardware is slower than A1200. I did not say that Hiarcs is better at long time control and I saw no evidence that support it. It did 2-2 against Fritz7 at long time control but it also did good results in blitz based on posts of some people. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.