Author: John Merlino
Date: 14:24:07 05/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2002 at 17:04:41, Robert Pawlak wrote: >I thought I should weigh in on this topic in a new thread, so that it doesn't >get lost in the noise. > >- The information was posted to CCC, which is a public forum. > >- I posted the information with attribution. In fact, it is the very first >sentence, and it links back to the original post here on CCC. > >- I have very little to gain in posting this information. I did it because I >know quite a few people are interested in news about CM9K. After all, it is the >top seller in its class. > >- I encourage manufacturers to post this type of information there for just this >reason. I sent an e-mail to everyone (including John) encouraging them to do so. >Unfortunately, not many wish to, and I end up posting it myself. If more >manufacturers would comply, this type of misunderstanding would never occur. > >- As per John's request, I have modified the original article. I have also >attempted to make it crystal clear that it is owned by him. > >- It is not my intent to "steal" anyone's intellectual property. > >Also, thanks to everyone that stuck up for me. I appreciate the support. > >Bob Many thanks, Bob. Sorry if I got a bit carried away with my original post here.... I think it was probably not due to your message, but to the fact that it was posted here with the title "CM9000 Review", which it obviously is not. As always, you've been very understanding. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.