Author: John Reynolds
Date: 17:42:56 05/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2002 at 20:13:17, Keith Ian Price wrote: >"I have a PhD in psychology. I specialize in 'cognitive' and >'cognitive/behaviorism'. A loss of concentration is due to being tired, >fatigued or exhausted or stress by definition." > >He said it was due to stress (pressure), not to being tired. You don't seem to >be disagreeing in your statement (note the words "or stress" that you added). >Therefore, Mogens and Martin were right, and you were wrong when you made the >following statement: "A loss of concentration is "tired" or "exhausted", that is >a psychological fact." >Also, the disrespect began with your statement, "As usual Mogen, you are wrong:" > >I don't find anyone on this board to be "ususally" wrong. > >kp I disagree, the tone in Mogens writing was Confrontational, I know neither Chris or Mogens, yet I got the feeling Mogens disliked chris immediately after reading his post.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.